
The biggest question about the 2009 season is why is this season being perceived as a disaster and not a misfortune?
It is a misfortune, isn’t it? No team in my memory has ever been hit as badly by injuries as this one. If it weren’t for the injuries, we’d at least be contending for the Wild Card, wouldn’t we? If the team was as healthy as it was last year, and if the performance level of the players was roughly the same, the addition of Frankie Rodriguez would be enough to push our win total up into the 90s, wouldn’t it?
Well, maybe.
There are those that say that a good major league organization has enough depth that it can compensate for injuries, even a rash of injuries as catastrophic as this one. To these people I say that if fewer players were injured, and we had gotten the fill-in performances we’ve gotten from Angel Pagan, Gary Sheffield, Livan Hernandez, Cory Sullivan, Alex Cora, and Omir Santos, we would have been quite happy with each of them. We are unhappy with the Met’s depth not because the Mets weren’t deep enough, but because nothing can make a whole team of worthy subs look as good as a real team. We may not have as many first-rate almost ready young players as we should, but that’s not why this particular season has been a disaster.
This season has been a disaster because in the midst of our catastrophic misfortune, we lost our faith. Having lost our faith, we were unwilling to cut the team any slack. We don’t feel badly for the Mets. We are unhappy with them. An enormous core of us remains loyal to the franchise. But we are in a moment of crisis, because we are floundering in our efforts to imagine what we are remaining loyal to. For the moment, we are unsure about what the Mets are. Things will not be right again until the Mets address this problem with intelligence and imagination, and not just with good baseball sense. We need to see signs that the Mets have enough intelligence, imagination, and good baseball sense to pull us through this difficult moment. This is where we can help them. We will not help them by being blandly and blindly supportive. We will also not help them by jumping the gun and making assumptions we don’t have enough evidence to make. We must make our voices heard. We must give them a chance and we must help them restore our faith in them.
Part of our loss of faith has to do with the straightforward issue of having a roster of players capable of getting to the playoffs. I continue to have faith that the vaunted core (Wright, Reyes, Beltran) is sound. I know that many are beginning to doubt that Reyes is all we thought he was, but I think it is more accurate to look at Reyes as a Strawberry-type player: a first-rate major leaguer who may or may not acquire, in his youth, the maturity to achieve his historic potential. Even if some doubts have crept in, I think most Mets fans still have faith in this core. Where most of us have lost faith is in the guys who were supposed to be our rotation. Pelfrey’s slump, Maine’s fragility, and Ollie’s many mysteries have left us with a starting rotation of Johan Santana and four players to be named later. No one can win a pennant with this. Of course, we could win over 100 games if Pelfrey, Maine, and Perez could ever pitch all together as each of them at certain points have pitched. But this is nothing to count on. As everybody knows, to even have a dream of contention, the Mets will have to purchase a bat who can replace Delgado’s and a starting pitcher who is not mainly imaginary.
Another loss of faith has been at the level of manager and general manager. Jerry Manuel, with his wit and intelligence, won us over last year by doing more with the team than Willie Randolph was able to do. The sloppiness of the Mets’ play this year, however, has made us wonder if he was, last year, simply the lucky beneficiary of the remarkable runs of Pelfrey and Delgado. Omar squandered years of good will, for no purpose, in the most embarrassing news conference I have ever seen anyone give. While there aren’t enough reasons, I think, for anyone to blame this season’s misfortunes on Manuel or Minaya, there simply aren’t enough Mets fans who feel that either of them needs to stay. We’ve lost faith in them. And the ownership must therefore know that getting rid of them would be a relatively easy (and inexpensive) way of making it look as if they are addressing the team’s problems.
I think it is fair to say, as a fact, not as a judgement, that the fans have lost faith in the baseball skills and capacities of the ownership and higher levels of management. I have been, over the years, a supporter and an admirer of the Wilpons as the owners of the Mets. I have never considered them cheap, I have never wanted owners like George Steinbrenner, and I have felt that they have made the right moves in three separate periods (the 80s, the late ‘90s, and the mid ‘00s) to bring the team back from the dead (I can’t determine to what degree they could be blamed for the team having died in the first place). But many, many, probably most fans have lost faith in the Wilpons. They must restore our faith or they must sell the team. Right now, fans doubt that the Wilpons have the money necessary to provide what the Mets need to compete with the Phillies next year. All economies are being interpreted as signs that the Wilpons are broke because of the Madoff swindle. I myself doubt that they are broke and I believe that the Mets are capable of paying for themselves if enough is invested in them. I am not making any judgements about the Wilpon’s solvency until I see what they actually do in the offseason. If they are broke, I beg them to sell the team. If they are not, I ask them to put their money on the table.
This brings me to what I consider to be a crucially important yet somewhat intangible reason for the widespread loss of faith in the Mets. I believe that the transition to Citi Field has prompted an identity crisis that needs to be addressed as much as the problems created by the weakness and uncertainty of the current roster. I think that a crucial, reason why Mets fans are so unwilling to cut the team, management, or ownership any slack is that there is a widespread unhappiness with the experience of the new stadium.
Even those of us who stubbornly adored Shea were looking forward to the new stadium. It has not been worth the wait. We were promised that we would be closer to the field and that we would have better sightlines. For those of us who are unwilling to pay more than double to see a game at Citi Field than we paid to see a game at Shea, the sightlines are worse and we are further from the field. We were promised a stadium that was a beautiful piece of architecture. The architecture is beautiful. We got to see how beautiful it was last year as it was being built. Once you put up immense and particularly unattractive ads everywhere you possibly can, however, the stadium’s beauty is lost. Shea, at least, had its sublimity. You saw the stadium and you saw the neon sculptures as you approached. Your spirit was lifted. When I approach Citi Field from any direction, I cannot avoid a disappointing sense that it looks like crap, that it is a little lovely stadium buried under a pile of ugly billboards. My spirit isn’t lifted. I am kind of embarrassed.
The worst thing about Citi Field, and the most trying for the faith of a longtime fan, are the many opportunities it affords for being excluded and even humiliated. It seems, at points, as if every few feet you run into people whose job is to tell you that you cannot freely walk past them. I find it humiliating to not be able to go to the vast, virtually empty area behind the dugouts to watch the players up close in batting practice the way I did for more than four decades at Shea. I hate having to plead to no avail with the men in the green jackets, just doing their job, to just get in there and take a picture or two. I hate the fact that all of the stadium below the Promenade Level and behind the infield (hey, that’s where I always used to sit at Shea! In an affordable seat with a great view of the field!) is turned over to luxury boxes and clubs for the rich. I hate seeing the emptiness of the best seats in the house, waiting there for the crowds of people, who never materialized, who were projected to be both rich enough and dumb enough to spend more than $200 for a ticket to see a baseball game. Citi Field leaves a bad taste in my mouth and the superior food from the Shake Shack and Blue Smoke and Catch of the Day is not enough to get it out.
Citi Field must also leave a bad taste in the mouths of the many middle-class people who paid more than they wanted to pay for a season ticket and who justified the expenditure to themselves by thinking that they would be able to resell the tickets they would not use. They can’t resell their tickets. They must take a big loss, in this economy. They cannot be happy. And those of us who look ahead to the period when the Mets will be good again, and season tickets holders will be able to sell their seats on the secondary market, are not happy with the stadium’s unforgivably tiny capacity.
Add to this that most Mets fans are still unhappy with the fact that in the three or so years they had to plan and design the new stadium, the Mets organization did not figure out how to present the place as the home of a proud and storied team that had been in existence since 1962. They did not anticipate the attachment that millions had to the heritage and history of that team even though their profits were dependent on the actual existence of those millions. They seem to have thought that the money would come as long as there was “good product” on the field. They did not understand the magnitude of what they were entrusted with. They did not understand the scope and scale of their responsibility. They didn’t even get a few display cases together. They didn’t even take the trouble to set up the Mets’ measly Hall of Fame. And they do not yet deserve any credit for having belatedly stuck up a few pictures without captions that appear to be nothing more than Nikon ads. I will resist the tendency I have to go on and on about my astonishment at this degree of obtuseness. But I will say that for a very significant number of Mets fans, this insensitivity has generated a great deal of bad will. In combination with the high ticket prices and the disappointments of the stadium and the season, it is a contributing factor to the fact that many Mets fans have lost their faith in the team.
The Wilpons can salvage much of this situation by looking us in the eye and listening to our voices. They can invest in another powerful hitter and another reliable pitcher. They can make Citi Field feel more like the home of the Mets. They can make it into a repository of our proud traditions, a place people can be fond of, a place where old timers can teach kids about what they have inherited. They can make the stadium more fan-friendly and less exclusive. They can stop telling us over and over how fan-friendly and wonderful they think it is. They can let us back into the area behind the dugouts for batting practice. They can let us into the club areas with a reservation. When somebody says that it would be nice to see an Old-Timer’s Day again, or a Banner Day, they can have somebody thoughtful and interested saying, “well, let’s look into that, fans might enjoy it.” The face and style of this franchise need to change. The organization should not behave like a bunch of corporate board members. They should behave like passionate fans, anxious to serve a loyal public.
Right now, Mets fans are unhappy because they don’t know who the Mets are. They don’t like what they see. They don’t recognize anything. Yet they are sticking with the team because they have no place else to go. Let the rebuilding of the Mets begin. Let’s get out of the woods and find our way back home. There is a lot of work to do. And the work that needs to be done is a lot more complicated than signing a few checks.
*******
Check out my just-published book: The Last Days of Shea: Delight and Despair in the Life of a Mets Fan
well said.
I lost faith in the Mets on the field late last September. I lost faith in the Mets being able to turn it around this summer. You say they made the right moves to come back on 3 separate occasions (during the Doubleday-Wilpon and Wilpon-and-son eras), but it falls into my theory of a pattern of bad behavior that they needed to do that more than the initial time nearly 30 years ago. I lost faith in the current ownership understanding the fans sometime last year (or even earlier than that) when the buzz word around Citi Field that I seemed to hear the most was “luxury box”. I just knew that they weren’t on the same page as the fans. Even the Citi Field experience wanted to show the luxury boxes. The only thing right about that was that it was inside Shea. I just didn’t really understand how much the ownership was on different pages from us until I saw what was and wasn’t in Citi Field. “If I knew what they were going to put in Citi Field, I would have cherished more of Shea”, I was quoted in the NY Times as saying. I’ve lost my faith (I’m sure I’ll be able to get it back someday), and I’ve lost my baseball home. I’m more angry over losing my baseball home than I am over the team. I’ve dealt with failure and disappointment more often than not. I’m a Mets fan.
Hi Dana,
You hit the nail on the head again. You summed up exactly what transpired this season.
I originally had blamed all the injuries on the ineptitude of the trainers and Omar Minaya and his “crackerjack scouts”(not). But after reading your blog I realize that it is much more. I hope that the Wilpons read your blog too and take your suggestions to heart. It is the least they can do for a team that sprung from the Wilpons’ beloved Dodgers and rival Giants.
My hope now is for the Mets to finish with a nice win streak, hopefully get to 500 or at least a game or two under, and be spoilers for the Wild Card Race. Let’s hope that anyone other than the Philles wind up in the World Series for the NL.
I wish the Wilpons read the blogs. I think they would understand the fan base much more thoroughly than if they just read the papers.
I hope the season ends with a kind of win streak that minimizes the total humiliation of the season. But the Mets would have to go 19-6 to finish at .500 and I would be shocked if that happened.
Congratulations on your new book and on so aptly voicing the hopeful hearts of the Mets fan base. My husband played for the Mets in the mid to late 1970’s and I can still recall the communal spirit and overwhelming support that the players received from the exhuberant fans. My guess is the ever present “Lone Ranger of Shea Staium”, who graced the stadium during that era and brought smiles to the children of the fans and the players, would not be able to afford a season ticket at the going rates.
Regrettably I never got the opportunity to return to Shea before it closed but I did manage to make it to the pre season contest between the Red Sox and the Mets this spring. I held fond memories of the warmth of the ushering staff at Shea and was hopeful I might run into some old friends. Granted I was no longer the wife of a current player and did not expect any special treatment, but I was astonished at the rudeness of one of your forementioned “rules oriented” ushers who refused to let my daughter and I pass through his station to speak with my daughter’s friend, even after I politely introduced myself and produced a MLB identification card.
And while I did admire the impressive Jackie Robinson rotunda, it seemed to lack any connection to the origins of the NY Mets Franchise.
In the tweleve years of major league baseball I shared with my husband we were with many teams who had last place locked up by the 4th of July, but we always shared faith in that “today’s game” was a new opportunity to start again. The Mets fans have always had the ability to believe, I hope continue to keep their faith in thier home town team.
FYI: My memoir MAJOR LEAGUE BRIDE; AN INSIDE LOOK AT LIFE OUTSIDE OF THE BALLPARK is due out later this fall. (McFarlandpub.com, ISBN 978-0-7864-4560). My book offers a glimpse into the triumpsh, joys and struggles that accompany the standing ovations and Bronx cheers in baseball as it spotlights the inner strength of the major league wives who support each other throughout the season. Glamorous, no….glorious, yes.
Kathleen, All Mets fans who rooted for the 1970s Mets (the good team and the later, less good team) remember your husband, Skip, with fondness and gratitude. How is he doing? He was a first-rate relief pitcher, effective both over several innings and as a closer. Younger fans should know that his 2.80 ERA over five seasons with the Mets is the third lowest of any Mets pitcher with more than 350 innings. That is really something to be proud of considering how many superb pitchers the Mets have had over the years.
It is interesting and sad to learn that the wives of former Mets (with MLB identification) are treated no better than Mets authors (let alone regular fans) when they just want to cross a forbidden line at Citi Field for just a few minutes.
Good luck with your book and please let us know when it is released. I’m looking forward to reading it.
Hi again Dana,
As usual, you have voiced what many of us, even the long time Met fans like myself, are feeling as the season mericfully comes to a close. However, I would like to play devil’s advocate with you regarding the new ballpark. My first point is this; I can understand the complaints being voiced by many fans regarding the lack of Mets historical content in the new park, but I’m just wondering why those concerns and complaints are being voiced now rather than at the beginning, or before the CitiField opened. When the Mets website, SNY, and other media outlets first showed diagrams, and then actual photos of the stadium as it was being erected, including all of the interior amenities that the stadium offered, why weren’t any complaints regarding any Mets photos, statues, voiced then? It’s not like we suddenly discovered what the stadium would look like from the outside and from the inside the very first game any Mets fan might have gone to, since there were so many photos, even TV specials like the ones SNY kept showing that outlined what fans would be experiencing when the got to CitiField. My other point is actually in the form of a question; Was the Shea Stadium that closed last year the same Shea Stadium that opened back in 1964? By that I mean, if you look at the whole history of Shea, how many improvements, innovations, additions (like the Home Run Apple) were made during that time in order to make the fan’s experience that much more rewarding? I’m sure that CitiField is not a finished product, rather, like most new buildings it is a work in progress, so who’s to say that as time goes on, more additions that are Mets related will take shape.
My feeling is that the frustration of the season has added to much of the angst regarding CitiField. I have gone to two games this season, and found the fan experience (sightlines, etc) were much better than they were at Shea.
Anyway, thanks for viewing this and I await your thoughts.
Dana–
I enjoyed this post very much and I think your interpretation of Citi Field and its contribution to our angst this season is profound. No one else is talking about it, and very few others connect Shea with Mets fandom as strongly. Our old home is gone.
Now, Citi is not bad per se, but it still doesn’t feel like it has much to do with the Mets. Perhaps we need a winning season there, or just an exciting one, a year where fans have a chance to just get loud the way we did at Shea.
It’s a shame that Shea is treated so shabbily in many fans’ own Mets mythology — and I give the owners credit for including it among the retired numbers.
This has just been such a weird season.
Stos, I think that when we were first getting previews of Citi Field, we weren’t quite sure what we were going to get when the stadium opened. In the beginning, I was hopeful that there was going to be a significant commemoration of the Mets past because the original press releases said something about a Mets museum. That was welcome news, and a significant improvement over Shea, but as we’ve seen, that has fallen by the wayside, although I did not know for certain that there wasn’t going to be a Mets museum until a Mets executive told me so in March. As for signs and banners and other objects, since those were not actual architectural details and only needed to be installed, it was possible to tour Citi Field, or even attend the St. John’s game, as I did, and think that they were still going to be installed.
I don’t actually dislike Citi Field. In fact, if one were to look over my blog pieces in the course of this year, you see a process of initial and almost inevitable disappointment, followed by reconciliation and even, at points, enthusiasm. But the souring of the season has brought back my initial resentments, and I suspect that this is the case for many fans. If the Mets were in the thick of the playoff chase, I think we would be feeling differently.
I don’t dislike Citi Field, but there are a number of things I dislike about it, and I certainly don’t feel at home in it yet. But I expect that someday I will. Still, no matter what happens, my $25 tickets in the Loge at Shea will always be better seats than my $25 tickets in the Promenade at Citi Field.
Dana, I fear when we lost Shea we lost our soul. Maybe I’m being a little over dramatic. On banners as you note in book I always brought one in my youth. I was much braver then. Once me and the guys had “Danny Frisella is our Fella” banner. (he wasn’t but we thought it would get on TV.) Much later in 2002 I guess I was at 40th commemoration game VS Dodgers. They got blown out Mets that is horrible. But, sign man was there! The word in crowd was it was his first appearance in decades. Anyway for this game I made a “banner” on “oak tag”. First one for me in decades also. I thought it was great, I had G-clefs and bars of of fabricated music notes around edges. It read “Where Have You Gone Choo Choo Coleman?” In the centre was an enlarged B/W photo I pulled from 1963 yearbook. I was much more reserved (less brave) I was too self concous to walk all over Stadium displaying it. I sheepishly held it up (in Field Level Box, oh the wonder of Stub Hub) and I got booed for obstructing view of fans to my rear! I did show it to sign man and he said it was a good banner, I sense he was patronizing me.