 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dana Brand's Mets Fan Blog</title>
	<link>http://danabrand.com/blog</link>
	<description>The blog that goes with metsfanbook.com</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on There Was Something Here by Theresa</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39165</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39165</guid>
					<description>The Yankees- remember the Bronx Zoo?  My favorite story from that era is Mickey Rivers and his wife playing bumper-cars in the Stadium parking lot.  Haw!!!

Thanks, Deb.  I think Fred Wilpon does a disservice to his fan base-- probably unintentionally, since his roots are as a National League fan from Brooklyn, himself.  Sure the Rickey Dodgers were solid citizens off the field, but Ebbets Field, as my mom describes it to me, was full of exuberant self-expression, and the play itself was exciting.  Those well-conducted gentlemen-- Robinson, boldly stealing bases, the guerilla batteries of Campanella and his crafty pichers-- Don Newcombe putting batter after batter on his @ss--hey, it was part of the game!  Furillo airing out his powerful right arm from right field, Duke Snider climbing the fence in center.  

I love characters in and around baseball-- one of the most lovable things about baseball is that it &lt;i&gt;has&lt;/i&gt; characters.  That's a big reason for my excessive devotion to Gary Keith and Ron, because among all the other things they do very well, they keep that alive.  They appreciate characters --&quot;Gotta have your cast of characters&quot; says Keith-- while also embodying them-- mostly through Keith. ;)

Deb, did you see that &lt;i&gt;Onion&lt;/i&gt; piece from last year, &quot;F***ing Yankees, Nation Reports&quot;?  One of my all-time favorite fake headlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Yankees- remember the Bronx Zoo?  My favorite story from that era is Mickey Rivers and his wife playing bumper-cars in the Stadium parking lot.  Haw!!!</p>
<p>Thanks, Deb.  I think Fred Wilpon does a disservice to his fan base&#8211; probably unintentionally, since his roots are as a National League fan from Brooklyn, himself.  Sure the Rickey Dodgers were solid citizens off the field, but Ebbets Field, as my mom describes it to me, was full of exuberant self-expression, and the play itself was exciting.  Those well-conducted gentlemen&#8211; Robinson, boldly stealing bases, the guerilla batteries of Campanella and his crafty pichers&#8211; Don Newcombe putting batter after batter on his @ss&#8211;hey, it was part of the game!  Furillo airing out his powerful right arm from right field, Duke Snider climbing the fence in center.  </p>
<p>I love characters in and around baseball&#8211; one of the most lovable things about baseball is that it <i>has</i> characters.  That&#8217;s a big reason for my excessive devotion to Gary Keith and Ron, because among all the other things they do very well, they keep that alive.  They appreciate characters &#8211;&#8221;Gotta have your cast of characters&#8221; says Keith&#8211; while also embodying them&#8211; mostly through Keith. <img src='http://danabrand.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Deb, did you see that <i>Onion</i> piece from last year, &#8220;F***ing Yankees, Nation Reports&#8221;?  One of my all-time favorite fake headlines.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There Was Something Here by debmc</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39161</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39161</guid>
					<description>Theresa, you are a woman after my own heart!  I feel the same as you do about most of those '80s Mets teams, and even if... er, I mean, WHEN, the Mets win another championship, I'm not sure I'll ever have that same feeling again.  Still, as it goes, 'tis better to have loved... AND WON, lol!

I love the characters of the game.  And characters don't necessarily have to ingest foreign and illegal substances, beat their wives and/or girlfriends (or BOTH, lol), get into drunken fights and car wrecks... they can simply be characters, like Yogi Berra, or Al Hrabowski, or Roger McDowell, or Jose Reyes.   These types give the game some color and put a human and slightly skewed face on it, and imo, the game is much better served with characters in it.

My fear is that the teams playing in these &quot;corporate homage&quot; stadiums are going to become as nameless, faceless, characterless and robotic as are the corporations who give them rise.  

And oh, by the way, the Yankees still suck.  If you get a chance (shameless blog humping moment, lol) check out my blog for my latest take on the subject of the Yankees and the postseason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theresa, you are a woman after my own heart!  I feel the same as you do about most of those &#8217;80s Mets teams, and even if&#8230; er, I mean, WHEN, the Mets win another championship, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ll ever have that same feeling again.  Still, as it goes, &#8217;tis better to have loved&#8230; AND WON, lol!</p>
<p>I love the characters of the game.  And characters don&#8217;t necessarily have to ingest foreign and illegal substances, beat their wives and/or girlfriends (or BOTH, lol), get into drunken fights and car wrecks&#8230; they can simply be characters, like Yogi Berra, or Al Hrabowski, or Roger McDowell, or Jose Reyes.   These types give the game some color and put a human and slightly skewed face on it, and imo, the game is much better served with characters in it.</p>
<p>My fear is that the teams playing in these &#8220;corporate homage&#8221; stadiums are going to become as nameless, faceless, characterless and robotic as are the corporations who give them rise.  </p>
<p>And oh, by the way, the Yankees still suck.  If you get a chance (shameless blog humping moment, lol) check out my blog for my latest take on the subject of the Yankees and the postseason.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There Was Something Here by Theresa</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39160</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39160</guid>
					<description>PS, I could write a whole book myself about my love for the '80s Mets, and how confounded I was by the perception of them, even sometimes right here at home, as &quot;bad.&quot;  That's why I have refused to buy the book &quot;The Bad Guys Won.&quot;  Some of them might have been consuming some iffy substances, but they brought a completely natural, matchless, thrill and joy to so many.  &quot;Bad&quot; my foot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, I could write a whole book myself about my love for the &#8217;80s Mets, and how confounded I was by the perception of them, even sometimes right here at home, as &#8220;bad.&#8221;  That&#8217;s why I have refused to buy the book &#8220;The Bad Guys Won.&#8221;  Some of them might have been consuming some iffy substances, but they brought a completely natural, matchless, thrill and joy to so many.  &#8220;Bad&#8221; my foot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There Was Something Here by Theresa</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39159</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39159</guid>
					<description>I loved it too. Deb, the Mets have always had a jitttery relationship with sparky, outspoken players since they held their breaths when Tug McGraw was interviewed, and M. Donald dealt Tom Seaver.  They want the talent, but they want a quiet clubhouse and no A-Rod type tabloid headlines-- and the Wilpons never really represented a big change from that.

After all, they brought together the '86 team (MY team, the team of my heart), won a World Series, then tried to tinker by removing the most disturbing moving parts that they felt they could afford to move.  Goodbye, Ray Knight, you talk too much  (World Series MVP).  Goodbye Roger McDowell, take your hotfeet elsewhere.  'Bye, Kevin Mitchell, you're just too  . . . erm, &quot;urban&quot; (also a future MVP).    Hello Kevin McReynolds with his empty eyes, and Greg Jeffries (ick).

They were jitttery with some reason.  After all, the guy they had obtained as a stable foundation, Keith Hernandez, went in front of Congress to talk about cocaine.  And Doc Gooden, the Golden Child, ended up in Smithers, recovering from it.  They &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; stick with Doc and Darryl for years, and hung in while they seesawed between brilliance and disasters.  

But Fred Wilpon has a very firm vision of what he thinks a baseball player should be-- Sandy Koufax-- and what he believes a baseball team should be-- the Branch Rickey Dodgers-- Hodges, Reese, Robinson, Erskine, etc. were all professors and clergymen compared with say, the St. Louis Cardinals of their day.  For a combination of corporate reasons and a personal vision, the Mets sadly skewed towards blandness, even when it was clearly counter-productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved it too. Deb, the Mets have always had a jitttery relationship with sparky, outspoken players since they held their breaths when Tug McGraw was interviewed, and M. Donald dealt Tom Seaver.  They want the talent, but they want a quiet clubhouse and no A-Rod type tabloid headlines&#8211; and the Wilpons never really represented a big change from that.</p>
<p>After all, they brought together the &#8216;86 team (MY team, the team of my heart), won a World Series, then tried to tinker by removing the most disturbing moving parts that they felt they could afford to move.  Goodbye, Ray Knight, you talk too much  (World Series MVP).  Goodbye Roger McDowell, take your hotfeet elsewhere.  &#8216;Bye, Kevin Mitchell, you&#8217;re just too  . . . erm, &#8220;urban&#8221; (also a future MVP).    Hello Kevin McReynolds with his empty eyes, and Greg Jeffries (ick).</p>
<p>They were jitttery with some reason.  After all, the guy they had obtained as a stable foundation, Keith Hernandez, went in front of Congress to talk about cocaine.  And Doc Gooden, the Golden Child, ended up in Smithers, recovering from it.  They <i>did</i> stick with Doc and Darryl for years, and hung in while they seesawed between brilliance and disasters.  </p>
<p>But Fred Wilpon has a very firm vision of what he thinks a baseball player should be&#8211; Sandy Koufax&#8211; and what he believes a baseball team should be&#8211; the Branch Rickey Dodgers&#8211; Hodges, Reese, Robinson, Erskine, etc. were all professors and clergymen compared with say, the St. Louis Cardinals of their day.  For a combination of corporate reasons and a personal vision, the Mets sadly skewed towards blandness, even when it was clearly counter-productive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to Mike and the Mad Dog As a Mets Fan by Nava B.</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39154</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39154</guid>
					<description>Some clarification on the Sirius rumour: it was either Newsday or the Post that reported Mad Dog was offered a $15 million deal to do a show on Sirius satellite radio. 

I've been a subscriber to XM satellite radio since its inception (about 6 years ago), and admittedly, I have come to take it for granted. It's kind of like having cable TV in your car! XM and Sirius are in the process of merging and combining their services, so there will be big changes. It is a wonderful thing if you're a music lover, and a sports lover since XM carries all the radio feeds of every MLB game. They also have a deal with the NHL to carry their game broadcasts, as well as an all hockey, all the time channel, NHL Home Ice. What's better than that? Well, I know you'll think of a few things, but remember who's writing here. 

You're right about Russo having more insight than Francesa. I guess I was focusing too much on his horrendous delivery to realize how passionate he actually is. Beneath all of that screetching and mangling of language, he definitely speaks from the heart, as opposed to Francesa, who often makes his opinions sound like clinical diagnoses. I believe his pomposity is genuine; it would be too exhausting to have to act that way 5 days a week for 5 hours at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some clarification on the Sirius rumour: it was either Newsday or the Post that reported Mad Dog was offered a $15 million deal to do a show on Sirius satellite radio. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a subscriber to XM satellite radio since its inception (about 6 years ago), and admittedly, I have come to take it for granted. It&#8217;s kind of like having cable TV in your car! XM and Sirius are in the process of merging and combining their services, so there will be big changes. It is a wonderful thing if you&#8217;re a music lover, and a sports lover since XM carries all the radio feeds of every MLB game. They also have a deal with the NHL to carry their game broadcasts, as well as an all hockey, all the time channel, NHL Home Ice. What&#8217;s better than that? Well, I know you&#8217;ll think of a few things, but remember who&#8217;s writing here. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about Russo having more insight than Francesa. I guess I was focusing too much on his horrendous delivery to realize how passionate he actually is. Beneath all of that screetching and mangling of language, he definitely speaks from the heart, as opposed to Francesa, who often makes his opinions sound like clinical diagnoses. I believe his pomposity is genuine; it would be too exhausting to have to act that way 5 days a week for 5 hours at a time.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There Was Something Here by debmc</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39149</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39149</guid>
					<description>I loved this entry, Dana.  I feel exactly as you do, and I hate the fact that they're scaling down the seating in Citifield.  Why couldn't they have built the design they wanted with more seating and more access available for us &quot;regular&quot; (translation:  not so sinfully rich that we can afford the exorbitant ticket prices even once a year) fans.

I don't like what baseball's turning into.  It's turning into the face of advertising for America's huge conglomerates, giving a face to previously faceless entities, and not a baseball face....the face is becoming the farce.  I understand things have to progress, and every once in a while you still get a Nelson Figueroa story or a burst of Jose Reyes enthusiasm, but the straight-arrow unemotional corporate type player which has evolved in this whole scenario to me takes some of the fun and interest out of the sport.  I mean, part of the fun of the '86 Mets was the boozer, bruiser and dope abuser image, the party boys, the bad boys... let's face it.  Think we're ever going to see that, or anything approaching that, ever again?  I think not.

It's sad, and I can't help but think that progress and intelligence could go hand in hand, somewhere, somehow.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this entry, Dana.  I feel exactly as you do, and I hate the fact that they&#8217;re scaling down the seating in Citifield.  Why couldn&#8217;t they have built the design they wanted with more seating and more access available for us &#8220;regular&#8221; (translation:  not so sinfully rich that we can afford the exorbitant ticket prices even once a year) fans.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like what baseball&#8217;s turning into.  It&#8217;s turning into the face of advertising for America&#8217;s huge conglomerates, giving a face to previously faceless entities, and not a baseball face&#8230;.the face is becoming the farce.  I understand things have to progress, and every once in a while you still get a Nelson Figueroa story or a burst of Jose Reyes enthusiasm, but the straight-arrow unemotional corporate type player which has evolved in this whole scenario to me takes some of the fun and interest out of the sport.  I mean, part of the fun of the &#8216;86 Mets was the boozer, bruiser and dope abuser image, the party boys, the bad boys&#8230; let&#8217;s face it.  Think we&#8217;re ever going to see that, or anything approaching that, ever again?  I think not.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad, and I can&#8217;t help but think that progress and intelligence could go hand in hand, somewhere, somehow.  LOL
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There Was Something Here by G-Fafif</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39126</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/18/there-was-something-here/#comment-39126</guid>
					<description>&quot;This place reminds me of a czarist ministry. No matter what the decision, you don’t feel it was yours.&quot;
--Abraham Menken, Mad Men</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This place reminds me of a czarist ministry. No matter what the decision, you don’t feel it was yours.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;Abraham Menken, Mad Men
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to Mike and the Mad Dog As a Mets Fan by Dana</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39118</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39118</guid>
					<description>Nava!  It's great to hear from you and yes let me know when you need a recommendation.  And yes it was infuriating how condescending M and MD could be when discussing sports in which they were not interested.  I agree with both Deb and Nava that Russo is more likely to be successful than Francesa since, truth be told, I think Russo, for all of his schtick, has offered me more insight over the years than Francesa (I also think that for all of his inarticulateness, he is actually slightly more articulate than Francesa).  I think that Francesa's pomposity is beginning to wear on a critical mass of people.  I think that the pomposity is also only palatable as part of an act, like Oliver Hardy's.  I'm not entirely sure how Sirius works and so I don't know what it actually means that Russo is going there.  I'll find other stuff to listen to.  I actually do listen quite a bit to NYC and FUV but sometimes, during the baseball season, you just want to hear sports radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nava!  It&#8217;s great to hear from you and yes let me know when you need a recommendation.  And yes it was infuriating how condescending M and MD could be when discussing sports in which they were not interested.  I agree with both Deb and Nava that Russo is more likely to be successful than Francesa since, truth be told, I think Russo, for all of his schtick, has offered me more insight over the years than Francesa (I also think that for all of his inarticulateness, he is actually slightly more articulate than Francesa).  I think that Francesa&#8217;s pomposity is beginning to wear on a critical mass of people.  I think that the pomposity is also only palatable as part of an act, like Oliver Hardy&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m not entirely sure how Sirius works and so I don&#8217;t know what it actually means that Russo is going there.  I&#8217;ll find other stuff to listen to.  I actually do listen quite a bit to NYC and FUV but sometimes, during the baseball season, you just want to hear sports radio.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to Mike and the Mad Dog As a Mets Fan by Nava B.</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39110</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39110</guid>
					<description>As much as it pains me to say, I agree that Mad Dog will continue to be successful on his own, but if he does go for the big bucks over at Sirius, his show will have to acquire a national scope, and lose its local flavour. A lot of the national sports shows (ie. ESPN radio) are never as successful as the local ones. It will be interesting to see how well he is received by listeners outside the tri-state area, if this turns out to be his chosen career path. 

As for Francesa, he needs to lose that smugness and horribly nasty attitude of his. When you watched the two of them during the televised portion of their show on the YES Network (my husband the die-hard Mets fan always TiVo'd them; please don't hold it against him), you could see how irritated and dismissive he was when dealing with the callers. But it was always Russo with his finger on the button cutting them off, with no opportunity for rebuttal. 

From a purely cultural standpoint, M&amp;#38;MD founded the sports-talk radio genre. If not for them, the format would probably not exist today. For that, they deserve credit, but I've always thought that Russo must have stepped in the most prolific pile of crap to get where he's gotten. Between his screetching voice, horrible enunciation, and unabashed butchering of the English language, he was the last person anyone would have pegged to have a successful radio career. 

Dana, I hope you find something to fill the drive-time void on the days you commute to and from Hofstra. I hear there's a charming little house for sale quite close to campus, that would spare you the hour and 45 minutes behind the wheel. Your former student is about to head back to the &quot;Motherland&quot; north of the 49th parallel. I'm trading in WFAN for The Fan 590 in Toronto. Finally, sports-talk radio will include hockey, which was always the bone of contention I held with M&amp;#38;MD. Their openly ignorant attitude about the sport infuriated me. I will miss the Mets terribly, but it will be fun to rekindle my Yankee hatred whenever they play the Blue Jays. 

Have a great semester. I'll probably need a recommendation letter at some point in the near future, so please keep one handy for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as it pains me to say, I agree that Mad Dog will continue to be successful on his own, but if he does go for the big bucks over at Sirius, his show will have to acquire a national scope, and lose its local flavour. A lot of the national sports shows (ie. ESPN radio) are never as successful as the local ones. It will be interesting to see how well he is received by listeners outside the tri-state area, if this turns out to be his chosen career path. </p>
<p>As for Francesa, he needs to lose that smugness and horribly nasty attitude of his. When you watched the two of them during the televised portion of their show on the YES Network (my husband the die-hard Mets fan always TiVo&#8217;d them; please don&#8217;t hold it against him), you could see how irritated and dismissive he was when dealing with the callers. But it was always Russo with his finger on the button cutting them off, with no opportunity for rebuttal. </p>
<p>From a purely cultural standpoint, M&amp;MD founded the sports-talk radio genre. If not for them, the format would probably not exist today. For that, they deserve credit, but I&#8217;ve always thought that Russo must have stepped in the most prolific pile of crap to get where he&#8217;s gotten. Between his screetching voice, horrible enunciation, and unabashed butchering of the English language, he was the last person anyone would have pegged to have a successful radio career. </p>
<p>Dana, I hope you find something to fill the drive-time void on the days you commute to and from Hofstra. I hear there&#8217;s a charming little house for sale quite close to campus, that would spare you the hour and 45 minutes behind the wheel. Your former student is about to head back to the &#8220;Motherland&#8221; north of the 49th parallel. I&#8217;m trading in WFAN for The Fan 590 in Toronto. Finally, sports-talk radio will include hockey, which was always the bone of contention I held with M&amp;MD. Their openly ignorant attitude about the sport infuriated me. I will miss the Mets terribly, but it will be fun to rekindle my Yankee hatred whenever they play the Blue Jays. </p>
<p>Have a great semester. I&#8217;ll probably need a recommendation letter at some point in the near future, so please keep one handy for me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to Mike and the Mad Dog As a Mets Fan by debmc</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39107</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39107</guid>
					<description>Yeah, although I have to admit, a little part of me thought their anti-Mets schtick to be pretty refreshing... at least, at FIRST, lol!  I mean, how much pro Mets can one take every day; at least at first, I thought their somewhat more objective voices were important.  Of course, later, it became clear that their anti-Met tirades (particularly Russo's) were more fueled out of love for their own teams, which made them equally as biased, only in the other direction.

Francesa is too arrogant and smug for my taste, although I do think there is a real human being in there, somewhere, dying to come out.  Russo's crazy schtick is entertaining to a point, but his sycophantic &quot;you're 100% right, Mike&quot;s really got on my nerves more often than not.

As I said, I believe Russo, without the rather large shadow of Francesa, will blossom and grow.  Francesa has a ways to go to make up what he's losing in Russo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, although I have to admit, a little part of me thought their anti-Mets schtick to be pretty refreshing&#8230; at least, at FIRST, lol!  I mean, how much pro Mets can one take every day; at least at first, I thought their somewhat more objective voices were important.  Of course, later, it became clear that their anti-Met tirades (particularly Russo&#8217;s) were more fueled out of love for their own teams, which made them equally as biased, only in the other direction.</p>
<p>Francesa is too arrogant and smug for my taste, although I do think there is a real human being in there, somewhere, dying to come out.  Russo&#8217;s crazy schtick is entertaining to a point, but his sycophantic &#8220;you&#8217;re 100% right, Mike&#8221;s really got on my nerves more often than not.</p>
<p>As I said, I believe Russo, without the rather large shadow of Francesa, will blossom and grow.  Francesa has a ways to go to make up what he&#8217;s losing in Russo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to Mike and the Mad Dog As a Mets Fan by Dana</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39105</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39105</guid>
					<description>I think you've expressed it perfectly, deb.  They did have an ability to make a big story personal.  I think that one of the reasons I could never hate them as much as their ludicrous analysis and humorless schtick deserved is that, in their first year, when the sudden news came in that Bart Giamatti had collapsed with a heart attack, they covered that story and made it personal with a degree of emotional sincerity that was genuinely moving.  Since Bart Giamatti was actually someone I knew, this made a very big difference to me.  I always cut them a little bit of slack because of this, I think.  I will miss them even though, objectively, and certainly as a Mets fan, I think their show was usually pretty terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ve expressed it perfectly, deb.  They did have an ability to make a big story personal.  I think that one of the reasons I could never hate them as much as their ludicrous analysis and humorless schtick deserved is that, in their first year, when the sudden news came in that Bart Giamatti had collapsed with a heart attack, they covered that story and made it personal with a degree of emotional sincerity that was genuinely moving.  Since Bart Giamatti was actually someone I knew, this made a very big difference to me.  I always cut them a little bit of slack because of this, I think.  I will miss them even though, objectively, and certainly as a Mets fan, I think their show was usually pretty terrible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Listening to Mike and the Mad Dog As a Mets Fan by debmc</title>
		<link>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39103</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://danabrand.com/blog/2008/08/16/listening-to-mike-and-the-mad-dog-as-a-mets-fan/#comment-39103</guid>
					<description>Spot on analysis, Dana.  I feel the same way about those two; although I readily admit listening on a daily basis, that's mostly because my radio is tuned to WFAN at work and in the car, and basically, FAN is the only station I listen to.  Pathetic, huh?  lol

M&amp;#38;MD do have a weird kind of appeal, though, that transcends sports.  I always looked forward to listening to them when a cataclysmic or even significant non-sports-related event occurred, I think there was nobody better than those two in taking such an event and making it personal and relating to it in a way only New Yorkers could.  I always appreciated that.

I will miss the show, if only for that, and if only because it was a NY sports institution, and a part of my daily routine.  And because I think the sum of the parts was infinitely better than each part, on its own.  

I think Russo will be wildly successful, but I don't think Francesa will, unless he truly reinvents himself and his show.  I think he will suffer more from the loss of Russo than Russo will from the loss of him; in fact, I think Russo will blossom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on analysis, Dana.  I feel the same way about those two; although I readily admit listening on a daily basis, that&#8217;s mostly because my radio is tuned to WFAN at work and in the car, and basically, FAN is the only station I listen to.  Pathetic, huh?  lol</p>
<p>M&amp;MD do have a weird kind of appeal, though, that transcends sports.  I always looked forward to listening to them when a cataclysmic or even significant non-sports-related event occurred, I think there was nobody better than those two in taking such an event and making it personal and relating to it in a way only New Yorkers could.  I always appreciated that.</p>
<p>I will miss the show, if only for that, and if only because it was a NY sports institution, and a part of my daily routine.  And because I think the sum of the parts was infinitely better than each part, on its own.  </p>
<p>I think Russo will be wildly successful, but I don&#8217;t think Francesa will, unless he truly reinvents himself and his show.  I think he will suffer more from the loss of Russo than Russo will from the loss of him; in fact, I think Russo will blossom.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 24.846 seconds -->
